A month after the summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US envoy Joseph Biden in the Swiss capital, delegates will have to overcome a number of obstacles in bilateral relations, which have worsened in recent times.
Observers and political scientists do not have high expectations for the outcome of the meeting, as happened at the June 26 presidential meeting, but they are optimistic that at least Moscow and Washington will talk about a key issue for world security.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Ryapkov, who is in Geneva to chair his country’s delegation, confirmed that Moscow has already shared its work proposals with Washington for possible cooperation in these matters.
‘We have already sent in writing. During the preparations for the meeting, we have raised a series of additional considerations as to what the agenda of the next works should be, ‘said the Dias News Agency.
He acknowledged in a statement to reporters that the two sides did not agree on all issues and that was why the meeting was being held in Switzerland.
He emphasized that the letter was not a signal of a formal antitrust inquiry into the allegations, but rather a signal of a formal antitrust inquiry into the allegations, adding that “there is some perspective.”
Barriers to mutual understanding are numerous, and they are long-lasting. Among them is Russia’s demand that the United States limit its anti-missile defenses, which Moscow sees as a long-term threat, and Washington, which is said to be blocking the threat of war.
This issue has diminished previous attempts to expand the scope of arms control deals, which have temporarily failed to include a barrier to ‘strategic’ or long-range nuclear missiles in the missile defense system.
At the negotiating table in Geneva, the Russian side is also expected to remind US Secretary of State Wendy Sherman, as head of her country’s delegation, of Washington’s departure from the most important agreements in the matter. Nuclear Security and Weapons Control.
The Russian president noted that the United States had recently signed an agreement extending the Treaty of Reduction and Control of Strategic Assault Weapons (Initial III), which, for five years, was supported by the Kremlin.
However, he criticized the White House’s decision not to respond to Moscow’s plans to stop sending short- and medium-range missiles to Europe.
The United States abandoned the Ballistic Missile (ABM) agreement signed by Richard Nixon in 1972 with the former Soviet Union in 2002. In 2019, then-President Donald Trump pulled the country out of the US anti-missile deal. Short and medium range (INF).
Most recently, in 2020, Washington dropped the Open Skies Agreement (ADT), which establishes a program of unarmed aerial reconnaissance aircraft over the territories of all party countries to enhance confidence among its members.
Scientists and experts in the political field have repeatedly warned of the weakness of the existing arms relationship between the United States and Russia, taking into account that the only agreement that unites them in the field of nuclear disarmament today is START III.
So, even if these Wednesday sessions do not make significant progress and understandings will be difficult, they will lead to additional conversations that will be a breakthrough, especially when global security is at risk.
ga / mml / cvl